ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl Versus Midazolam and Remifentanil for Sedation in Patients Undergoing Ablation Procedures
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine and compare this to a current technique commonly used at TGH for sedation in patients undergoing ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter. The investigators hypothesise that dexmedetomidine will be at least equivalent to, or more so, in terms of effectiveness and safety, when compared to midazolam and remifentanil for sedation during ablation procedures.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Application of Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride Injection in Anesthesia for Patients Without Tracheal Intubation#861455
- Safety And Efficacy Of Dexmedetomidine Sedation In Intubated Mechanically Ventilated Infants With Respiratory Failure#890035
- Post-Marketing Clinical Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine in Post-Operative Patients#887904
- Magnesium vs. Dexmedetomidine in TURBT Under Spinal Anesthesia#846174
- Dexmedetomidine an Effective Drug in Reducing Anesthetic Requirements in External Dacrocystorhinostomy (DCR) Patients#900612
Record · ID 877338
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive