ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Thoracoscopic Versus Endocardial Ablation in Patient With Paroxysmal AF After Failed Initial Endocardial Ablation
The investigators aimed to compare two approaches thoracoscopic epicardial ablation and endocardial catheter ablation after failed initial catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Benefit of Left Atrial Roof Ablation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation#855072
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Extensive Electro-Anatomical Guided Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation#1103817
- International Multicenter Project Comparing Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Implantable Defibrillator After Well-tolerated Ventricular Tachycardia in Ischemic Heart Disease With Minimally Impaired Ejection Fraction#801612
- A Trial of High Power-Short Duration Versus Standard Power-Long Duration Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation#835432
- Primary Percutaneous Pericardiotomy for Malignant Pericardial Effusion (PMAP)#883579
Record · ID 878537
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive