ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Effects of a Classic High-frequency rTMS Treatment Versus a Deep rTMS Treatment
The main objective is to demonstrate that dTMS is more efficient than high frequency rTMS with a conventional coil. The patient will receive treatment arm A or B : Arm A : classic rTMS treatment (use of the 8-shaped coil) and standard therapy Arm B: treatment with deep rTMS (use of the H-shaped coil (helmet)) and standard therapies. 20 rTMS sessions are planned (5 sessions per week) and 3 follow-up visits : at Day 30, Day 60 and Day 90.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- rTMS and Body Weight-support Treadmill Training After Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury#1072101
- Closed-loop RTMS for Short-term Migraine Prevention#906492
- Comparative Effect of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization and Deep Transverse Friction Massage in Patients With Trapezius Myalgia#967569
- Inverted ILM Repositioning as Treatment for Full Thickness Macular Holes#897807
- Electric Field Navigated 1hz Rtms for Post-stroke Motor Recovery Trial#1150262
Record · ID 878551
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive