ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Monocanalicular Versus Bicanalicular Intubation in the Treatment of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction
The aim of the study was to compare the success rate of monocanalicular intubation versus bicanalicular silicone intubation in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children aged between 10 and 36 months.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Study of Primary Surgical Treatment of Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children Less Than Four Years Old#982671
- Follow up of Nasolacrimal Intubation in Adults#882162
- Determination of Voiding Patterns of Children With Vesicoureteral Reflux#864671
- Different Stylet Angles for Orotracheal Intubation Using Glidescope® Video Laryngoscope in Children#802834
- Clinical Study of Lacrimal Drainage Obstruction Diseases Using Dacryoendoscopy#862829
Record · ID 879520
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive