ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Remifentanil vs. Nicardipine for Controlled Hypotension in Elective Nasal Surgery
This study compares remifentanil infusion versus nicardipine infusion for controlled hypotension during elective nasal surgery. Both agents are standard clinical methods. The study evaluates hemodynamic stability, surgical field quality (Fromme-Boezaart score), tissue perfusion, intraoperative blood loss, surgeon satisfaction, and perioperative adverse effects.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Does Melatonin Affect Anesthetic MAC (Minimum Alveolar Concentration)?#811052
- Inflammatory Response After One-lung Ventilation According to Ventilation Methods#1103422
- Utility of the Perfusion Index as an Indicator of Anesthetic Depth during Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Neurosurgery with Intraoperative Neuromonitoring : A Prospective Observational Study.#351774
- Effect of Low-Flow Anesthesia in Single Lung Ventilation on Postoperative Respiratory Complications#829395
- Prevention of Postoperative Respiratory Complications#803746
Record · ID 879538
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive