ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Can SIS Using Air Bubbles Replace HSG for Fallopian Tubal Patency After Essure Placement
The study evaluates whether saline infused sonography (SIS) with directed air bubbles for hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy) is as good as or better than X-ray hysterosalpingography (HSG) for determining whether fallopian tubes are open or closed in patients who are undergoing an Essure confirmation test.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Accuracy of Hystro-Salpingo-Foam-Sonography (HYFOSY) as Tubal Patency Test in Comparison to Laparoscopy in Infertile Patients#890893
- Darwish Test (Office Hysteroscopic Bubble Suction and Tubal Peristalsis) in Cases of Intrauterine Polyp(s)#901644
- Evaluation of a Laparoscopic High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Probe for the Ablation of Small Renal Masses#867714
- Estimation of Preoperative Gastric Volume Using Ultrasound#910964
- Safety and Efficacy of Distending Media Infusion by Manual Syringe Method for Hysteroscopic Procedures#1126473
Record · ID 879716
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive