ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Trial Comparing Start Stimulation of Recombinant Follicle Stimulating Hormone (rFSH) on Cycle Day 2 Versus Cycle Day 5 in In Vitro Fertilization (IVF)
Background of the study: Milder stimulation protocols have the advantage of being less expensive and more patient-friendly. Moreover, recent evidence suggests that mild stimulation protocols lead to lower embryo aneuploidy rates compared to conventional treatment regimens. Although with mild stimulation protocols the expected number of oocytes retrieved will be lower, pregnancy rates have shown to be similar possibly because embryo quality outfavours embryo quantity. Objective of the study: The aim of the study is to determine whether cycle day (CD) 5 start of stimulation will lead to better quality of embryos, based on morphology, than CD 2 start, in IVF with GnRH antagonist co-treatment started on a fixed day. Study design: Prospective randomized trial comparing two different starting days of ovarium stimulation (day 2 versus day 5) for IVF treatment. Intervention: One group wil start on cycle day 2 with stimulation of the ovaries with recombinant FSH. The other group will start on cycle day 5. Both group will start suppressing the gonadotrophin production of the the pituitary gland on cycle day 6 with a GnRH antagonist. Primary study parameters/outcome of the study: Primary outcome parameter is number of top embryos per ovum pick up. Secondary study parameters/outcome of the study: Secondary outcome measures are duration of stimulation, cancellation rate, fertilization rate, number of cumulus oocyte complexes obtained, number of mature oocytes obtained, number of top embryos per started cycle, amount of IU recFSH, and clinical pregnancy rate.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Micronized Progesterone vs Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) Antagonist in Freeze-all IVF Cycles.#882381
- Cetrotide Treatment Optimization#828594
- Comparison of the Live Birth Rate Between the PPOS and the GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Patients Undergoing IVF#810277
- The Effect of a Dual Trigger on Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) Reproductive Outcomes#913790
- Comparison Between Testosterone and Estradiol Over the Homogenization of Follicular Cohort#896369
Record · ID 880124
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive