ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison Between a Standard Tube and the Ultra-thin Tritube for Intubation of the Trachea and for Maintaining Access to the Trachea After Anaesthesia, in Patients With an Expected Difficult Direct Laryngoscopy
The investigators compare the ease of intubation between a new ultra-thin endotracheal tube, "Tritube", and a standard endotracheal tube in patients with predictors of difficult laryngoscopy. Furthermore the investigators compare the acceptance of leaving the Tritube in trachea after end of anaesthesia, with the use of a tube exchange catheter.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Nasogastric Tube Insertion Success in Difficult and Easy Airway Patients#910862
- Video-stylet for Nasotracheal Intubation in Limited Mouth Opening Patient#897149
- Comparison of Physiological Effects of Two Types of High-Flow Oxygen Therapy in Tracheostomized Patients#803703
- Hemodynamic Changes of Tracheal Intubation With McCoy and Macintosh Laryngoscopes#875611
- Study for Appropriate Operating Table Height for Endotracheal Intubation Under Direct Laryngoscopy#1153630
Record · ID 880155
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive