ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
NeoAdjuvant Therapy Comparing Sacituzumab Govitecan+Pembrolizumab vs. SoC Chemotherapy in Clinical Stage II-III, Triple-negative Early Breast Cancer
TNBC is a heterogeneous disease with distinct pathological, genetic, and clinical features among subtypes. Treatment results for high-risk primary TNBC remain poor compared to other breast cancer subtypes. Preoperative chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients with stage II or III primary TNBC. Multiple lines of clinical evidence demonstrate that TNBC patients who achieve a pCR to NACT, (ypT0/is ypN0), have an excellent long-term prognosis. A meta-analysis of individual patient data confirmed a strong association of pCR after NACT with improved long-term event-free survival (EFS, hazard ratio \[HR\] 0.24) and overall survival (OS, HR 0.16) benefit. Taxane- and anthracycline-based neoadjuvant regimens generally result in pCR rates between 25-50% \[REFs\], whereas the addition of platinum increases pCR rates to approximately 50-55%. The KEYNOTE-522 trial has demonstrated that the addition of the immune-checkpoint inhibitor PEM to anthracycline- (AC), taxane- and platinum-based NACT resulted in a significant increase in pCR rates to nearly 65%, associated with a significant reduction of recurrences (EFS, HR 0.65 at 5 years) and improvement of OS (HR 0.66). Based on these results, the KEYNOTE-522 regimen has been approved by the FDA and EMA and has become the standard of care for patients with stage II or III TNBC. Despite this significant progress, two major questions remain unresolved which will be investigated in the ADAPT-TN-IV trial: 1. Do all patients require the full 6 months of NACT as per KEYNOTE-522 or is there a subgroup of patients who are sufficiently treated with 12 weeks of NACT plus PEM? 2. Can incorporation of ADCs into the KEYNOTE-522 regimen improve response and outcomes in patients without an optimal early response? The outcome of patients with residual disease after 24 weeks of NACT and PEM remains suboptimal and there is an urgent need for more effective strategies. ADCs such as SG have demonstrated superior efficacy compared to standard
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Combination With Toripalimab for HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer (NEOTORCH-BREAST01)#852502
- Association Between RVT and Prognosis After Neoadjuvant Targeted Therapy in EGFR NSCLC#915577
- Posaconazole Plus PD-1 Inhibitors and Chemotherapy vs PD-1 Inhibitors and Chemotherapy in Neoadjuvant Therapy for Triple Negative Breast Cancer#873409
- TREND-02 - a Phase II Exploratory De-escalation Trial of Neoadjuvant Sacituzumab Govitecan Plus Tislelizumab (SG/I) in Early Triple-negative Breast Cancer#801712
- Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Combination With Toripalimab for HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer : a Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-controlled, Multi-center Phase III Study (NEOTORCH-BREAST04)#864759
Record · ID 880323
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive