ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Access Sheaths With Aspiration for Renal RetrOgrade Surgery, Randomized CompArative Outcomes
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether the ClearPetra ureteral access sheath (Coloplast) is more effective than the Navigator ureteral access sheath (Boston Scientific) in treating intrarenal kidney stones of 1-3 cm in adult patients undergoing flexible ureteroscopy (RIRS). The main questions it aims to answer are: Does ClearPetra achieve a higher stone-free rate at 1 month post-intervention compared to Navigator, as assessed by non-contrast abdominal-pelvic CT scan? Does ClearPetra reduce total surgical time compared to Navigator? Does ClearPetra lower the retreatment rate at 3 months compared to Navigator? Does ClearPetra present a rate of clinically significant complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ II) that is lower than or similar to Navigator? Researchers will compare flexible ureteroscopy using the ClearPetra vacuum-assisted flexible ureteral access sheath to flexible ureteroscopy using the Navigator standard rigid ureteral access sheath, to see if ClearPetra leads to higher stone clearance rates while maintaining a comparable safety profile. Participants will: Undergo flexible ureteroscopy (RIRS) using one of two randomly assigned ureteral access sheaths (ClearPetra or Navigator), determined by computer-generated randomization immediately before surgery Have a non-contrast abdominal-pelvic CT scan at 1 month post-intervention to assess stone-free status Have a non-contrast abdominal-pelvic CT scan at 3 months post-intervention to evaluate residual fragments and the need for retreatment Attend follow-up visits at 1 month and 3 months post-surgery for clinical assessment and complication recording The study will be conducted at the Urology Department of Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (Seville, Spain), a tertiary reference centre. A total of 156 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio (78 per group), with pre-defined subgroup analyses stratified by stone size (1-2 cm vs. \>2 cm). The outcome assessor evaluating CT images for stone-fr
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones With a Diameter≤2cm by Intelligent Pressure-controlled Flexible Ureteroscope#1095642
- ClearPetra™ Vacuum-assisted Ureteral Access Sheath vs Traditional Approach#851658
- The Role of Preoperative Ureteral Diameter Measurements in Predicting Difficult Access During Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis of 234 Patients#909065
- Under Direct Vision vs Under Non Direct Vision of Insertion of UAS in RIRS#826911
- Prospective Assessment of Procedure-Related and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) for Renal Calculi Less Than 20 mm#810121
Record · ID 881071
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive