ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
COMPARISON OF KOHLI AND FOLEY CATHETERS IN SUPRAPUBIC CATHETER PATIENTS
The purpose of this medical research study is to compare two different urinary drainage catheters to see which has fewer problems with blockages and pain. The study involves completing 16 weekly 3-question surveys either online or by phone. The new catheters are FDA-approved and will be provided for FREE. No medications will be given.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Preventing Catheter Related Bladder Discomfort (CRBD) With Bilateral Pudendal Nerve Block#897516
- A Randomized Control Trial Comparing Single vs. Multiple Application of Lidocaine Analgesia Prior to Urethral Catheterization Procedures#894280
- Clinical Study Investigating Safety and Performance of a New Urinary Intermittent Catheters in Healthy Volunteers#827843
- Intranasal Fentanyl as an Analgesic for Cystoscopic Procedures#879934
- Voiding Efficiency, a Predictor of Clean Intermittent Catheterization (CIC)#885229
Record · ID 881648
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive