ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Foley Catheter Versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Induction of Labor in Parous Women at Term: A Randomized Trial
The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of transcervical foley catheter as compared to dinoprostone vaginal insertion for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction in term parous women with unfavorable cervix.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Trial of Prostaglandin E2 Tablets Versus Foley Catheter for Labor Induction#850525
- Induction ATAD Catheter and Lower Segment Thickness#1164825
- Safety and Usability of the Inga Catheter for Labor Induction (INGA-MDP)#905642
- Outpatient Foley For Starting Induction of Labor at TErm#993659
- Laminaria Tents Versus Vaginal Prostaglandin in Cervical Ripening#1085289
Record · ID 881689
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive