ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Recurrent Persistent Atrial Fibrillation:In-situ Ablation Vs Extensive Ablation
This is an open label, randomized parallel control clinical trial, to compare extra-PV extensive ablation with in-situ ablation as two strategies for the treatment of PerAF to identify the mechanisms of PerAF recurrence.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Advanced TecHnologies For SuccEssful AblatioN of AF in Clinical Practice#877665
- Catgut Embedding in Acupoints on Treating Persistent Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation#1141000
- Comparison of Two Pulmonary Vein Ablation Techniques for Persistent AF#1161875
- Unipolar Atrial Electrogram Modification Combined to the Contact Force Sensing Technology for Pulmonary Vein Isolation#1096308
- Antral Lesions Characterization of a New Cryoballoon Ablation System in Terms of Local Impedance Drop#1124738
Record · ID 881738
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive