ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
SA Versus SOI Surfaces for Single Implant-supported Crown
The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare clinical data and implant stability of immediately loaded TSIII Osstem implants with Sandblasted and Acid-etched (SA) surface versus implants with SA surface modified with pH buffering agent for the rehabilitation of single implant-supported crown.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluation of Implant Stability Changes in Sites Prepared with Different Osseodensification Techniques: a Prospective Observational Clinical Study#1113713
- Quantitative and Color-Coded Assessment of Crown Preparation Using a 3D-Printed Channel and Hole Guide: A Pilot Comparison With Conventional Guides.#297450
- Clinical Performance of Full Coverage Hybrid Ceramic Crowns in the Aesthetic Zone: A Randomized Clinical Trial#890470
- Fracture load of feldspar ceramic crowns: effects of surface treatments and aging#173465
- The 10-year Follow-up of the Delta-TT Trial.#813921
Record · ID 882040
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive