ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Ultrasound Guided Erectror Spinae Block Versus Intracavitary During Medical Thoracoscopy
The primary aim: is to compare the effect of US guided ESP block at two levels versus intracavitary blockade in medical thoracoscopy on total peri-procedural (intraoperative and post-operative 12 hours) nalbuphine consumption (mg) during medical thoracoscopy. Secondary aims: Time to first rescue analgesia, postoperative VAS, haemodynamics, recovery time (Aldert \> 9), and adverse events
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Intravenous Nalbuphine#909799
- Rigid Versus Semirigid Thoracoscopy in Diagnosing Pleural Diseases: a Randomized Study#1115186
- Evaluation of Patient Analgesia After Bloc Serratus#839384
- The 90% Effective Dose of Nalbuphine in Mechanical Ventilated Patients in the ICU#833311
- Comparison Of Analgesic Methods İn Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery#800897
Record · ID 882526
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive