ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Prevena™ Incision Management System vs Conventional Management for Wound Healing
Comparison in abdominal wound healing after contaminated or dirty surgery with incisional negative pressure wound therapy versus standard dressing.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Use of the Prevena Incision Management System (PIMS) on Closed Incisions in Renal Transplant Subjects#919114
- Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery#1125355
- Application of PREVENA in Reducing Surgical Site Complications Following Reversal of Ileostomy or Colostomy#863969
- Effects of Preventive Negative Pressure Wound Therapy With PICO on Surgical Wounds of Kidney Transplant Patients#1058173
- The Avelle® Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System on Chronic Wounds#377378
Record · ID 883368
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive