ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Multi-center prospective randomized trial of single port laparoscopic surgery (SILS) versus conventional 3-4 ports laparoscopic hysterectomy. Hypothesis is that conversion rate of SILS is not inferior to that of conventional approach.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparative Study of Blood Loss in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy by Ligation the Uterine Arteries in Different Techniques.#1162943
- To Compare to 2-channel and Multiple-channel Single Port Laparoscopic-assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy#868726
- Total Laparoscopic Hystrectomy Versus Total Abdominal Hystrectomy#909172
- Use of the Enseal Intrument for Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy#1059652
- Outcomes of Three Ports Versus Four Ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Sohag General Surgery Department Experience#1088771
Record · ID 883501
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive