Conceptio › Archive › ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov public full text Public Domain

Two Different Approaches During Fluoroscopically Guided Interlaminar Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection

Kenneth D Candido · 2010
ClinicalTrials.gov · Datasets · License: Public Domain · 2010
Open Source ↗
na
The purpose of this study is to compare two different approaches (midline and parasagittal) during interlaminar lumbar epidural steroid injection (LESI), and to verify the role of concordant pressure paresthesia occurring during the LESI in determining outcome. The investigators are planning to include 100 patients, undergoing LESI for radicular low back pain. This will be single-blinded randomized study. Every patient will receive the same medication we would use regardless of participating in the study. The patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups, based on the approach: * Group I (50 patients) - will get LESI using midline (MIL) approach. * Group II (50 patients) - will get LESI using parasagittal interlaminar (PIL) approach.
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 883502
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive