ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Effectiveness of Bioactiveglass Air Abrasion Versus Fluoride Varnish in Management of Dentin Hypersensitivity
Will the use of Bioactive glass with air abrasion technology (Sylc) compared to Fluoride Varnish (Biflourid 10) affects the degree of pain in patients complaining from hypersensitivity due to non-carious lesions?
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Preliminary Efficacy of APP13007 to Treat Inflammation and Pain After Cataract Surgery#1101107
- Three Different Topically Applied Materials as Non-invasive Treatment of Sensitivity in Permanent Teeth With Molar Incisor Hypomineralization#995348
- Potassium Nitrate Gel and Diode Laser in the Treatment of Dentinal Hypersensitivity#854055
- Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy of Oral Senicapoc Administration on Exercise-induced Asthma#1114684
- A Pilot Study to Substantiate the Use of the Jay Sensitivity Sensor Probe#883671
Record · ID 883756
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive