ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Premium Monovision Versus Other Types of Monovision and Bilateral Trifocal Implantation.
Primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of premium monovision with Restor and Panoptix, against other prevalent monovision techniques and against bilateral Panoptix implantation in a sample of patients following lens-extraction surgery.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- ACRYSOF® Restor Apodized Diffractive IOL Postmarket Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes and Life-Style Visual Performance RESTOR IOL SN60WF IOL (Control Group)#967395
- Evaluation of Approved Contact Lenses#800749
- Contralateral ReSTOR / Monofocal or Phakic Eye#881321
- Comparative Study of 2 Multifocal Intraocular Lenses in Heidelberg#1162586
- DAILIES TOTAL1® Lens Centration in a Japanese Population#864923
Record · ID 883888
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive