ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Contoura Vision Outcomes Programmed Using the Manifest Refraction Verses Using Phorcides Planning Software in Patients With Oblique Astigmatism
The objective is to compare the percentage of monocular UDVA -0.1 logMAR (20/16) outcomes for each planning strategy (Phorcides and manifest refraction) at the 3-month post operative visit.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Investigation of the Accuracy of an Automated Refractor to Provide Well-tolerated Eyeglass Prescriptions#831013
- Visual Performance of Center Distance Daily Disposable Multifocal Lenses#880033
- Comparative Study of 2 Multifocal Intraocular Lenses in Heidelberg#1162586
- Evaluation of Approved Contact Lenses#800749
- Predicting Manifest Astigmatism in Keratoconus Patients.#879483
Record · ID 884527
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive