ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Targeted Left Ventricular Lead Placement, Comparison of Active Fixation Bipolar and Passive Quadripolar Pacemaker Leads
A prospective, randomized and patient-blinded trial comparing an active fixation left ventricular lead with quadripolar passive left ventricular leads. The leads were compared in order to identify differences in the electrical performance, the ability to achieve a stable proximal position in a coronary vein located concordant to target segment and clinical outcome. The patients were followed up for 12 months.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Effects of Left Ventricular Pacing Optimilization on Cardiac Perfusion, Contractile Force, and Clinical Performance in Patients With Ventricular Dysfunction and Heart Failure#1170389
- Conventional Biventricular Versus Left Bundle Branch Pacing on Outcomes in Heart Failure Patients#226138
- Comparison Between Early and Late Mobilization After Cardiac Device Implantation#1127402
- Conduction System Pacing Versus Biventricular Resynchronization in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure#898809
- Quality of Life in Patients Treated With Leadless Pacemakers#1114201
Record · ID 884581
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive