ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Safety and Efficacy of Mechanical Versus Electrocautery Dilator for EUS-guided Biliary Drainage (MED-BD)
The purpose of this study is to investigate the likelihood of post-dilation bleeding using mechanical or electrocautery dilation. We hypothesized that the risk of bleeding is lower in the mechanical group.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Factors Affecting the Effective End-tidal Concentration of Desflurane Anaesthesia#870424
- Thoracic Drains in Intensive Care Units: Comparison of Seldinger and Surgical Methods#978899
- BIA-Guided vs. Conventional Fluid Resuscitation in ICU Patients#808103
- Prospective Randomized, Controlled Trial for Treatment of Intraventricular Hemorrhage#900995
- Active Versus Non Active Drainage for the Treatment of Infected Intra-abdominal Collection#831105
Record · ID 884853
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive