ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Prospective Clinical Study of Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margin of Colo-Rectal Cancer Liver Metastases
This prospective single arm double-blind study approved by the Ethics Committee of the institution, will be conducted on at the Oncology Institute of Vojvodina in Sremska Kamenica, Serbia. Patients with colo-rectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) is presented to the multi-disciplinary team (MDT).Screening and enrolment is conducted after established of indication for resection. The surgeons assesses resection margin (RM) for every resected liver specimen (RLS) intra-operatively by inspection and palpation. These data will be compared with pathological RM examination as a "gold standard". Resection margin of 1 mm or more will be rated as negative RM (RM-) otherwise RM is positive (RM+). Taking the result of the pathohistological examination as "gold standard" it is determined that RM is true positive when the pathologist and surgeon agreed that the RM is positive. False negative RM is when the surgeon assesses RM as negative and pathologist as positive. The sensitivity of the surgical assessment of RM+ is defined as the rate of RM+ which was correctly identified. True negative RM is determined when the pathologist and surgeon agreed that it is negative RM. False positive RM defined when the surgeon assessed RM as positive, but pathologist found that it was RM-. The specificity of the surgical assessment of RM is defined as the rate of RM- which is correctly identified. Total accuracy represents the rate of correctly recognized positive and negative RM, relative to the total number of samples. Agreement between surgeon and pathologists finding will be analyzed as well as difference between them. Disease recurrence and disease-free survival (DFS) will be analyzed by RM.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Cytoreductive Surgery and Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) Versus TACE for Hepatocellular Carcinoma#907478
- Comparison of Liver and Renal Function After Transarterial Chemoembolization for Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Iso-osmolar Contrast Media and Low Osmolar Contrast Media#871911
- Multicolour Versus Monocolour Specimens Inking After Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary Cancer#906517
- The Treatment of Unresectable Liver Cancer With E-TACE Combined With Donafenib:A Prospective, Single-arm, Multicenter, Observational Study#913428
- Outcome of Transarterial Chemo-embolization (TACE) in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients With Partial Portal Vein Thrombosis#1139827
Record · ID 885657
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive