ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Follow-up After Surgery for Colon Cancer. General Practice vs. Surgical-based Follow-up?
The purpose of this study is to clarify cost effectiveness and quality of life issues among colon cancer patients followed up in a hospital setting or by their GP's.Statement of study hypothesis:Postoperative follow up of colon cancer patients (according to national guidelines) by general practitioners will not have any influence on patients' quality of life. There will not be observed any increase in serious clinical events and cost effectiveness will be improved.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Should Colorectal Cancer Patients be Followed After Five Years? Study of Recurrence in a Population Cohort#849786
- ERAS Lazio Network Clinical Registry#842074
- Follow-up After Surgery for Colorectal Cancer#1140477
- Prospective Registration Study of Totally Laparoscopy Versus Laparoscopy Assisted Colon Cancer Surgery#1095857
- The Impact of Postoperative Complications After Colon Cancer Surgery on Locoregional Recurrence: A Population-Based Dutch Cohort Study#345903
Record · ID 885736
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive