ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Two ACL Reconstruction Techniques: All-inside Versus Complete Tibial Tunnel Technique
This study intends to perform an all-inside and complete tibial tunnel ACL reconstruction technique in 80 patients, and compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of the two surgical procedures through follow-up.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Study of QL Analgesic Response and Extent#825950
- Minimally Invasive Atlantoaxial Lateral Mass Joint Fusion (MIS-PALF) As a Surgical Treatment of Atlantoaxial Dislocation#1100578
- Combining an Anterolateral Complex Procedure With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Reduces Graft Reinjury Without Increasing the Rate of Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials#347991
- Intradermal Suture Versus Stapling for Groin Skin Closure in Vascular Surgery (VASC-INF Trial)#890647
- Transtibial Amputation Outcomes Study#872252
Record · ID 886375
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive