ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Karyotyping, CMA and NIPT for Prenatal Diagnosing Chromosomal Anomalies
This diagnostic test is aimed to compare the Karyotyping, CMA and NIPT for prenatal diagnosing chromosomal anomalies. Pregnant women who needed prenatal genetic diagnosis meted the study criterion; fetal amniotic fluid was regular examined by Karyotyping and CMA, and maternal peripheral blood was collected for NIPT detecting. And the CMA result as a golden standard, the main outcome is compared the diagnostic efficacy of NIPT for diagnosing chromosomal anomalies.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Thrombophilia and Thyroid Autoimmunity in Implantation Failure and Recurrent Miscarriage#829768
- New Biological Tests in Patients With Antiphospholipid Antibodies#1057914
- Amniochorionic Membrane Cells in the Maternal Blood as a Biomarker for Preterm Birth#800184
- Prediction of the Efficacy of Activated Recombinant Human Factor VII in Adult Congenital Haemophilia A or B Patients With Inhibitors by Use of Thromboelastography#1044497
- Pattern Recognition and Anomaly Detection in Fetal Morphology Using Deep Learning and Statistical Learning#1096715
Record · ID 886753
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive