ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Oral Aprepitant and Transdermal Scopolamine for Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Recent evidence suggests multiple drug therapy is superior to single agents. The study compares the incidence of nausea, vomiting, need for rescue medication, prolonged PACU time, and unplanned hospital admission in patients with high risk for PONV treated with oral aprepitant with or without transdermal scopolamine preoperatively.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Aprepitant Versus Aprepitant and Transdermal Scopolamine for Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting#994307
- Effectiveness of Triple Therapy With Palonosetron for PON Prophylaxis#846609
- Evaluation of Cassia Fistula + Senna Alexandrina Miller in the Chronic Functional Constipation Treatment.#1153818
- The Effects of Anesthetic Techniques and Palonosetron Administration on the Incidence of PONV#858566
- A Study to Investigate Quality of Recovery up to Day 7 in Females Undergoing Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery Provided Apfel-score Based PONV Care and Prophylaxis#1044571
Record · ID 886906
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive