ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Fistulectomy and Primary Sphincter rEconstruction vs. endorectaL Advancement Flap in the Treatment of High Anal Fistulas
The optimal method of surgical treatment of complex anorectal fistulas has not been found yet. The aim of this study is to compare two techniques in treatment of high anorectal fistulas. This study purpose to demonstrate that the fistulectomy with dissection from 1/3 to 2/3 of the height of the sphincter complex with primary suturing is technically simpler, equally effective and safe in comparison with muco-muscular endorectal advancement flap.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- LIFT Technique Versus Seton in Management of Anal Fistula#978805
- Anal Sphincter Reconstruction After High Recurrent Anorectal Fistula Excision#897445
- Ligation of Inter-sphincteric Fistula Tract for Management of Anal Fistula#812267
- Seton or Glue for Trans-sphincteric Anal Fistulas#903029
- Seton Re-routing for High Perianal Fistula#1171186
Record · ID 887237
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive