ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of 2 Strategies of Adjustment of Mechanical Ventilation in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
The aim of this multicenter randomized controlled trial is to compare the impact on mortality of patients mechanically ventilated for acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome of two strategies for setting end-expiratory pressure.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Effect of Closed-Loop Versus Conventional Ventilation on Mechanical Power#994129
- Prone Position in infantS/Children With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome#864878
- Quality of Life After COVID-19 Related Acute respIratory Distress Syndrome Among ICU Survivors Patients in Italy: the ODISSEA Study.#833294
- Effectiveness of Recruitment Maneuvers and Lung Protective Ventilation Strategy in ARDS#1073574
- The Prone Position in Covid-19 Affected Patients#1163130
Record · ID 887857
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive