ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Assessing the Efficacy of Intravenous Acetaminophen Versus the Oral Formulation for Perioperative Pain Treatment
To compare oral (PO) to intravenous (IV) acetaminophen with postoperative pain scores, and consumptions of opiates, among orthopedic surgery patients undergoing total knee replacement with spinal anesthesia. Our hypothesis is that IV acetaminophen patients will have improved analgesia, less opioid consumption, a lower percentage of patients rescuing, or a longer time to first rescue with IV acetaminophen. The investigators will compare the efficacies of oral and intravenous acetaminophen for postoperative pain control, and utilization of opiates as rescue agents.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Post-op Acetaminophen vs NSAID Use on Lumbar Spinal Fusion Outcomes#898237
- IV vs Oral Acetaminophen in Spine Fusion Perioperative Care#900680
- Postoperative Pain Control in Septum and Sinus Surgery#982017
- Effect of Combined Use of Naloxone and Tramacet on Postop Analgesia in Elderly Patients Having Joint Replacement Surgery#899112
- Naproxen for Acute Pain After Surgery: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial#967104
Record · ID 888451
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive