ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Direct vs Digitally Guided Miniscrew Placement for MARPE
This randomized clinical trial compared the accuracy, primary stability, and anatomical safety of two protocols for palatal miniscrew placement in adolescents requiring maxillary skeletal expansion. Participants were randomly assigned to either direct appliance-guided miniscrew placement for MARPE or digitally guided CAD/CAM-assisted miniscrew placement. Postoperative CBCT imaging was used to assess placement accuracy and anatomical safety, while clinical evaluation was used to assess primary stability.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluation of the Accuracy of Palatal Orthodontic Miniscrew Placement.#872429
- "Computer-Guided vs Freehand Zygomatic Implant Placement#847424
- Accuracy of Static Computer-assisted Implant Surgery in Distal Free-end Scenarios#813519
- Fully Guided Versus Conventionally Guided Implant Placement by Dental Students#1087650
- The Effectiveness of Combined Design Nance/Transpalatal Arch Appliance in Maintaining Arch Dimensions After Premature Extraction of Primary Molars#1093421
Record · ID 888593
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive