ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
EndoVascular Aortic Dissection Early vs Delayed
This is a prospective, multicenter, non-inferior, parallel-controlled observational study. This study aims to compare clinical outcomes of endovascular treatment for acute high-risk type B aortic dissection in the acute phase versus the subacute phase. No interventions will be imposed on the patients' standard treatment. Patients with acute high-risk type B aortic dissection will be grouped based on the actual timing of their treatment.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Retrograde Ascending Dissection: Intraluminal Aortic Therapy#1115205
- Open surgery versus branched endovascular repair of the aortic arch in residual dissections after type A surgical repair#126786
- Time Is Aorta: Can Artificial Intelligence Improve Surgical Timelines in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection? A Comprehensive Review.#406425
- Clinical Characteristics, Management Patterns and Outcomes of Type A Aortic Dissection: A Sino-US Comparative Cohort Analysis#857194
- Risk Factors for Aortic Dissection in the Chinese Patients#886660
Record · ID 889500
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive