ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Revisional Versus Primary Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Case Matched Analysis
This study compared revisional malabsorptive laparoscopic very very long limb gastric bypass (VVLL RYGB) with primary VVLL RYGB and tested the hypothesis that one staged revisional laparoscopic VVLL RYGB is a safe and effective procedure after failed restrictive gastric banding.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Laparoscopic Revision Gastric Bypass for Inadequate Initial Weight Loss#1086193
- Comparative Outcomes of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass As Revisional Procedures Following Failed Restrictive Bariatric Surgery#172449
- Examining Patterns in the Involvement of Gastric Bypass Patients in Clinical Studies#873631
- the Related Factors of Bariatric Surgery on Liver Function#1029934
- Long-term Effects of Bariatric Surgery#28531
Record · ID 889529
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive