Precision Regional Node Irradiation for Sentinel Node-positive Breast Cancer

Axillary lymph node dissection has long been regarded as standard if treatment of the axilla is indicated for patients with a positive sentinel node. Although axillary lymph node dissection provides excellent regional control, it is associated with harmful side-effects. Since the publication of IBCSG23-01, ACOSOG Z0011 and AMAROS study, these studies indicated that there was no significant difference in recurrence and overall survival rates between the ALNB and SLNB+ALND followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. Therefore, an adaptation of the strategy to omit axillary lymph node dissection in patients with low-risk axillary involvement who are treated with curative surgery and systematic therapy. However, they also pose new challenges for adjuvant radiotherapy decisions. In the Z0011 study, patients were required to receive breast tangent field radiotherapy. In the AMAROS study, axillary radiotherapy included level I-III axillary lymph node drainage areas and the supraclavicular area, but the study results showed a local recurrence rate of only 1.19% at 5 years in the axillary radiotherapy group. Consequently, there is considerable controversy among clinical experts about whether a combined regional lymphatic drainage area radiotherapy strategy is necessary for low-burden sentinel lymph node metastasis breast cancer patients. In contrast, results from the EORTC-22922 and MA-20 studies, which included patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection, showed that adjuvant radiotherapy to the entire lymphatic drainage area, including the internal mammary region, reduced the risk of disease-free survival and breast cancer-specific mortality. Therefore, the adjuvant radiotherapy strategy for early breast cancer patients with low-burden sentinel lymph node metastasis remains controversial, with a lack of high-level evidence to support it.