ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Investigation of Transvenous Versus Epicardial Left Ventricular Stimulation Technique
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that epicardial and transvenous left ventricular leads are safe and effective for cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients implanted with a CRT device.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- High Intensity His Bundle Pacing in Heart Failure Patients With Narrow QRS Outcome Study#1104338
- International Multicenter Project Comparing Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Implantable Defibrillator After Well-tolerated Ventricular Tachycardia in Ischemic Heart Disease With Minimally Impaired Ejection Fraction#801612
- Bi-ventricular Epicardial Activation in Left Bundle Area Pacing: a Comparison Study#1046693
- Right Ventricular Contractile Reserve in HF#201648
- The effect of cardiac resynchronization without a defibrillator on morbidity and mortality: an individual patient data meta‐analysis of COMPANION and CARE‐HF#364095
Record · ID 890331
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive