ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Galilei Lens Professional vs. Predicate Devices: a Comparison Study
Study question: How does the new GALILEI Lens Professional compare to predicate devices? Study hypothesis: The GALILEI Lens Professional achieves a better precision in the postoperative, calculated target refraction with cataract surgeries than predicate devices, and it is more versatile in the measurable parameters as well as more user-friendly.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Clinical Evaluation of Manufacturing Processes for a Reusable Multifocal Optical Design in a Presbyopic Population#893734
- Investigation of the Accuracy of an Automated Refractor to Provide Well-tolerated Eyeglass Prescriptions#831013
- CAtaract ASSessment of IntrOcular Lens Objective PErformancE#845216
- Comparing Low-cost Handheld Autorefractors - a Practical Approach to Measuring Refraction in Low Resource Settings#868788
- Comparison of Two Multifocal Contact Lenses#832370
Record · ID 890348
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive