ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
ERAS vs Conventional Approach in Peptic Perforation-RCT
This study compares 2 different ways of perioperative management in patients of peptic perforation. Experimental arm is the ERAS arm( Enhanced recovery after surgery) and the comparative arm is Conventional arm.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Relationship of Stump Length With Muscle Strength in Patients With Traumatic Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation#829123
- Continuous Positive Air Way Pressure in Cardiac Rehabilitation After CABG#981083
- Autologous Platelet Gel in Wound Healing of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Patients#848759
- Early Feeding and Mobilization in Thoracic Surgery#866185
- Ablation for ICD Intervention Reduction in Patients With CAD#909787
Record · ID 890594
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive