ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Efficacy of Induction of Labor on Term Using a Double Balloon Catheter Compared to Dinoprostone Vaginal-insert
The purpose of the study is to determine the efficacy of a silicone-double-balloon-catheter for cervical ripening and labor induction in women with unfavorable cervix (Bishop Score not greater than 6) compared to medical treatment using a dinoprostone slow-release-vaginal-insert.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Trial of Prostaglandin E2 Tablets Versus Foley Catheter for Labor Induction#850525
- Cervical Ripening Balloon in Induction of Labour at Term#1075403
- Vaginal Dinoprostone Administration Prior to a T380A Intrauterine Device Insertion in Nulliparous Women.#804783
- Comparative Efficacy of Lidocaine Spray Versus Vaginal Dinoprostone in IUD Insertion#800890
- Comparing Outpatient and Inpatient Use of a Cervical Balloon for Starting Labor in Low-Risk Pregnancies.#847582
Record · ID 891262
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive