ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Two Methods of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) to Support Successful Extubation of Infants of Birth Weights ≤ 1500 Grams (C2CPAP)
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has been used successfully to promote extubation in the premature infant population. The two methods of CPAP to be examined are currently used by many institutions, yet no study has compared these methods to determine which is better in the population of newborns \ 65 mmHg or a sustained increase in FiO2 of 0.15.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparative Effectiveness Study of Bubble CPAP Devices in the NICU#1138564
- Comparing Bubble and Ventilator Nasal CPAP in Preterm Infants#861393
- Tactile and Kinaesthetic Stimulation in Neonates With Hyperbilirubinaemia#982129
- Nebulized 3% Hypertonic Saline Versus Normal Saline in Managing Children With Acute Bronchiolitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial#1033423
- Evaluation of the Neonatal Autonomic Stress During Intubations Under Propofol in a Population of Premature Infants Under 33 w'GA#1094419
Record · ID 891956
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive