ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Evaluation of the Palmaz Mach-5 Grooved Bare Metal Coronary Stent System Versus the Palmaz Bare Metal Coronary Stent System in Patients With Symptomatic Ischemic Heart Disease: A Safety and Performance Study
This is a six (6) month, randomized, un-blinded, study to assess the safety and performance of the Palmaz Mach-5 Grooved Coronary Stent System vs. the Palmaz Bare Metal Coronary Stent System.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Prospective, Single-arm, Multicenter Study for Evaluation the Safety and Effectiveness of the ALEX Stent in a Real-world Setting of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease#969049
- Do Cobalt Chrome Stent and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Have Equivalent Clinical Result in Non-Complex Lesion?#1126012
- PROMUS Element Plus US Post-Approval Study#1102706
- A Clinical Trial to Assess the SYNERGY 48 mm Stent System for the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Lesion(s)#852846
- Cobalt Chromium Stent With Antiproliferative for Restenosis II Trial (COSTAR II)#1162780
Record · ID 892227
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive