ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Percutaneous Cannulated Screws Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Displaced Isolated Medial Malleolar Fractures in Adults
The aim of this prospective randomized controlled trial is to compare the functional and radiographic outcomes of closed reduction and percutaneous cannulated screws fixation and ORIF in treatment of displaced isolated medial malleolar fractures.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Open Reduction in Femoral Neck Fractures#838877
- A Comparative Study Between Positional and Lag Screws for the Fixation of Medial Malleolar Fractures#908171
- Fixation of the Posterior Malleolus in Medium-sized Trimalleolar AO Weber-B Fractures.#830263
- Reamed Nailing Versus Taylor Spatial Frame in Tibia Shaft Fractures#1089169
- Do Generic Volar Locking Plates Provide Similar Outcomes at a Reduced Cost?#1088177
Record · ID 892605
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive