Conceptio › Archive › ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov public full text Public Domain

Comparison of Primary Long Full Coverage Stenting vs Primary Short Spot Stenting for Long Femoropopliteal Artery Disease.

Yonsei University · 2011
ClinicalTrials.gov · Datasets · License: Public Domain · 2011
Open Source ↗
na
Hypothesis: Primary long full coverage stenting is superior to primary short spot stenting in the treatment of long (≥80 mm) femoropopliteal artery lesions. Study design : * Prospective, randomized, multi-center study * A total of 220 subjects with symptomatic peripheral artery disease of lower limbs who meet all inclusion and exclusion criteria will be included. * Patients will be randomized in a two by two factorial manner according to the strategy of stenting (long versus short stenting) and the additional use of cilostazol. Each randomization of the enrolled subjects will be done 1:1. * Patients will be followed clinically for 1 year after the procedure. * Angiographic or CT follow-up will be performed at 1 year.
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 892987
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive