ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Efficacy of Sensory Electrical Stimulation Versus Alternating Electromyogram (EMG) On Functional Recovery Of Hand in Chronic Stroke Survivors :Randomized Controlled Trial
This study aims to find out which treatment works better for improving hand function in stroke patients: sensory electrical stimulation or alternating electromyogram (EMG) stimulation. Both methods use electrical stimulation to help patients regain hand movement, but they work in slightly different ways. The goal is to see if one method is more effective than the other in helping stroke survivors recover their hand abilities.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Therapies for Recovery of Hand Function After Stroke#968326
- Wireless Nerve Stimulation Device To Enhance Recovery After Stroke#839105
- Clinical Effects of Peroneal Nerve Functional Electrical Stimulation (WalkAide[R]) for Chronic Stroke Patients#1045690
- The Effect of Different Schedules of Functional Task Practice for Improving Hand and Arm Function After Stroke#1057148
- IMPULSE - StIMulation of Brain Plasticity to Improve Upper Limb Recovery After StrokE#994816
Record · ID 893099
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive