ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Cyclophotocoagulation in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
The use of Cyclodestruction procedures has been extended to patients with non-refractory glaucoma and good vision. Our aim is to compare the safety and efficacy of three cyclodestructive treatments; High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Cyclocoagulation versus micropulse cyclophotocoagulation (MP-CPC) versus transscleral continuous wave cyclophotocoagulation (CW-CPC) for the treatment of Primary open angle glaucoma.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Morphometric Markers of the Effectiveness of Micropulse Cyclophotocoagulation#843324
- the Pops-titration Versus the Slow-coagulation Cyclophotocoagulation in Treatment of Refractory Glaucoma#366669
- Comparison Between Two Techniques of Subthreshold Diode Laser Cyclophotocoagulation in Refractory Glaucoma#1140465
- Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation in Normal Tension Glaucoma#394652
- Ocular Fluorophotometry for Glaucoma Treated With Cyclo-coagulation Using High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU).#314411
Record · ID 893107
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive