ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Cost Effectiveness of OMT for Chronic Low Back Pain
The specific aim of this study is to conduct a prospective, multicenter cohort study over four months to compare the cost of standard of allopathic care (control group, N=90) versus standard of care plus osteopathic manipulative treatment (experimental group, N=90) in a cohort of 180 consecutive patients seeking treatment for chronic low back pain at three osteopathic clinics and three allopathic medical clinics (offering only standard care) located in three different regions of the United States.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Osteopathic Manual Treatment for Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain and Upper Extremity Function in Stroke Patients#835982
- MOBile Instruction for Low Back Pain (MOBIL)#1165031
- Treatment Options for Pediatric Chronic Pain: How do we Best Disseminate Our Scientific Findings#855939
- Effects of Pain Neuroscience Education vs. Self-Management Education in Low Back Pain#863652
- Ultrasound of the Thoracolumbar Fascia for Diagnosing Chronic Low Back Pain#1093672
Record · ID 893976
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive