Comparative Efficacy of 3L and 2L Integrated Techniques for Gynecologic Cancer-related Lower Extremity Lymphedema: a Retrospective Study

The goal of this retrospective study is to evaluate the long-term efficacy of 3L versus 2L integrated techniques in patients with gynecologic cancer-related lower extremity lymphedema (GCR-LEL). The main research question is: Do 3L integrated techniques provide superior long-term outcomes in reducing lower extremity lymphedema compared to 2L techniques in patients with GCR-LEL? Medical records of patients who have received either 3L or 2L integrated interventions as part of their routine clinical management for GCR-LEL were reviewed and analyzed to assess treatment outcomes over an extended follow-up period.