PhilArchive
open access
Meme-making: Poaching, Reappropriation, or _Bricolage_?
Memes are a prominent example of a kind of digital artifact. It is widely agreed that an integral component of meme-making is the way in which it makes use of other existing material. In this paper, I examine three different ways of understanding this making use of. First, it has been seen in economic terms, as a kind of poaching. Secondly, the cultural concept of (re)appropriation has been deployed. Finally, Lévi-Strauss’s notion of bricolage is often mentioned. I argue that despite some interesting insights deriving from the first two approaches, it is the third that gives the most comprehensive and interesting take on meme-making.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Copyright and the Two Cultures of Online Communication#271053
- Memetic Theory, Trademarks & the Viral Meme Mark#338884
- Meme Template Identification in the Wild: Comparing Methods for Semi-Open-Set Recognition#1129040
- Veracity versus Virality: Philosophical Reflection on Works at Bandung Photography Triennale 2022#71694
- Geometry-Aware Localized Watermarking for Copyright Protection in Embedding-as-a-Service#10264
Record · ID 89456
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive