ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
The Comparative Effectiveness of Hybrid Revascularization (MIDCAB Then PCI) With DES Versus Multivessel DES PCI or CABG
Minimally invasive revascularization of the left anterior descending artery followed by stent implantation versus percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass in patients with multi-vessel coronary disease
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Time-trend Analysis of Clinical Characteristic and Outcomes in Patients With Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease Treated With PCI Over a 10-year Period#1101428
- Impact of Different Treatment in Multivessel Non ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) Patients: One Stage Versus Multistaged Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)#1031312
- Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial#1088382
- Prospective, Multi-Center, Random. Study of CoStar Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent(Direct Stenting vs. Pre-Dilatation)#824950
- The Use Of FFR Guided PCI Versus Complete Revascularization and Treatment Of Infarct Related Artery Only In Patients With STEMI#1161369
Record · ID 894684
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive