ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
MIKROBE Management of Infected Knee Replacements-Obtaining Best Evidence
Following a prosthetic knee joint infection, two types of operative approach can be undertaken to treat the infection: a one-stage or two-stage revision operation. Both approaches are widely used and are good at treating infection but we don't know which has the best long-term outcomes for patients. This trial aims to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial to evaluate whether treating a prosthetic knee infection with one-stage revision surgery gives a better outcome than two-stage revision surgery in terms of patient function and pain, and cost-effectiveness.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention in Early Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study#829575
- Intra-Articular Injections Prior to Total Knee Arthroplasty Do Not Increase the Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Prospective Cohort Study#291696
- Optimys Femoral Stem for Total Hip Replacement#910743
- Total Hip Registry#878731
- Antibiotic Elution in Total Knee Arthroplasty#1030521
Record · ID 895560
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive